Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!decwrl!decvax!ucbvax!pnet01.cts.COM!scotto
From: scotto@pnet01.cts.COM (Scott O'Connell)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: recording telephone conversations
Message-ID: <1902@crash.CTS.COM>
Date: Sat, 24-Oct-87 14:56:08 EST
Article-I.D.: crash.1902
Posted: Sat Oct 24 14:56:08 1987
Date-Received: Wed, 28-Oct-87 07:04:33 EST
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: sdsu!crash.CTS.COM!news@sdcsvax.ucsd.edu
Organization: People-Net [pnet01], El Cajon, CA
Lines: 23
Approved: telecom@xx.lcs.mit.edu


'C-mon people -- get some facts before you jump to conclusions!

Each of you claim the other is wrong in every message I read.  Just because
*you* think you're right doesn't mean the other person in wrong.

Lynn Gold accurately described the laws of California regarding recording a
telephone conversation.  I'll take a guess that Sanford Gardner looked at his
local phone book and said "wrong, wrong, wrong!!" and decided to tell us all
that LYNN WAS WRONG, and I KNOW WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT.

jsol ACCURATELY stated that the laws vary from state to state.  Why shouldn't
we have guessed this in the beginning?  What other laws are *exactly* the same
in all 50 states?

I come here for information, normally this information is well researched,
quality material that I can make decisions from.  Not lately.


Scott O'Connell - Datagram Corp.   UUCP: {cbosgd hplabs!hp-sdd sdcsvax nosc}...
3297 Sweetwater Springs Blvd #8          ...!crash!pnet01!scotto
San Diego, CA 92078-1477           ARPA: crash!pnet01!scotto@nosc.mil
800/235-5030                       INET: scotto@pnet01.cts.com