Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!rutgers!sunybcs!boulder!hao!oddjob!gargoyle!ihnp4!chinet!dag
From: dag@chinet.UUCP (Daniel A. Glasser)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: MAJOR ANSI C FLAW (actually, RAD50 vs. RAD40)
Message-ID: <1761@chinet.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 22-Oct-87 18:44:32 EST
Article-I.D.: chinet.1761
Posted: Thu Oct 22 18:44:32 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 25-Oct-87 12:07:55 EST
References: <1132@gilsys.UUCP> <1246@bsu-cs.UUCP> <6543@brl-smoke.ARPA> <880@sugar.UUCP> <157@bhjat.UUCP>
Reply-To: dag@chinet.UUCP (Daniel A. Glasser)
Organization: Chinet - Public Access Unix
Lines: 11



Actually, RAD50, Radix-40, RAD40, Rad-40, etc., are all the same thing.
Rad-50 is Rad-40 in Octal!  Some RSTS-E documentation called it rad-40.
There are, in fact, only 40 characters in the RAD50 character set.
-- 
					Daniel A. Glasser
					...!ihnp4!chinet!dag
					...!ihnp4!mwc!dag
					...!ihnp4!mwc!gorgon!dag
	One of those things that goes "BUMP!!! (ouch!)" in the night.