Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!mcvax!enea!tut!jh
From: jh@tut.fi (Juha Hein{nen)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Subject: Re: First Class Environments in Scheme?
Message-ID: <1951@korppi.tut.fi>
Date: Thu, 29-Oct-87 01:32:24 EST
Article-I.D.: korppi.1951
Posted: Thu Oct 29 01:32:24 1987
Date-Received: Wed, 4-Nov-87 02:39:02 EST
References: <3431@sol.ARPA> <23200001@silver> <2095@watcgl.waterloo.edu> <179@yetti.UUCP>
Reply-To: jh@korppi.UUCP (Juha Hein{nen)
Organization: Tampere University of Technology, Finland
Lines: 11
Keywords: scheme, macros

Also to me the scheme-84 extend-syntax facility is nice and easy to
use but why can't the Scheme community agree to standardize it?  As we
all know many useful extensions to Scheme (scoops, environments,
records, etc.) are implemented using syntax extension.  Without a
standard systax extension facility these extensions can't be easily
ported from one implementation to another.
-- 
	Juha Heinanen
	Tampere Univ. of Technology
	Finland
	jh@tut.fi (Internet), tut!jh (UUCP)