Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!homxb!mtuxo!mtune!rutgers!husc6!hao!ames!pioneer!lamaster
From: lamaster@pioneer.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.misc
Subject: Re: The truth about ITS & Multics & TSS.
Message-ID: <3259@ames.arpa>
Date: Fri, 30-Oct-87 12:31:46 EST
Article-I.D.: ames.3259
Posted: Fri Oct 30 12:31:46 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 1-Nov-87 08:53:29 EST
References: <7367@alice.UUCP> <48800008@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu> <1877@frog.UUCP> <3190@ames.arpa> <990@cg-atla.UUCP> <1720@geac.UUCP>
Sender: usenet@ames.arpa
Reply-To: lamaster@ames.UUCP (Hugh LaMaster)
Organization: NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, Calif.
Lines: 25

In article <1720@geac.UUCP> daveb@geac.UUCP (Dave Collier-Brown) writes:

>  Some ITS people on the net! Spiffy! 
>  Now that both systems are rare (and their discussion is unlikely
>to produce a full-fleged flame war), could we hear what ex-users of
>ITS and Multics thought were their beast and wirst points?  Er, best
>and worst points?
>
> David Collier-Brown.                 {mnetor|yetti|utgpu}!geac!daveb

I've noticed a few TSS people on the net too.  TSS was modeled on MULTICS
and had a very nice mix of features (and a few bugs), so, you might want
to include it in your discussion :-)






  Hugh LaMaster, m/s 233-9,  UUCP {topaz,lll-crg,ucbvax}!
  NASA Ames Research Center                ames!pioneer!lamaster
  Moffett Field, CA 94035    ARPA lamaster@ames-pioneer.arpa
  Phone:  (415)694-6117      ARPA lamaster@pioneer.arc.nasa.gov

(Disclaimer: "All opinions solely the author's responsibility")