Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!mit-eddie!ll-xn!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!mail.aston.ac.UK!ABBOTTP From: ABBOTTP@mail.aston.ac.UK Newsgroups: comp.os.vms Subject: (none) Message-ID: <8710211825.AA09387@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> Date: Wed, 21-Oct-87 15:19:19 EDT Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8710211825.AA09387 Posted: Wed Oct 21 15:19:19 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 24-Oct-87 06:39:56 EDT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 91 Date: 21-Oct-1987 07:51 BST Subject: Error messages From: Peter Abbott Dept: Computing Service Tel No: 021 359 5492 -direct TO: Remote Addressee ( _POST INFO-VAX%KL.SRI.COM@UCL.CS.NSS ) Having just posted a request to info-vax I have received the following error messages (extracts only). Please can the person responsible for the redistribution list in each case `tidy up'. I and no doubt others find it annoying to receive mutiple error messages. Peter Extracts:- Sender: Postmaster%arpa.lll-icdc@uk.ac.ucl.cs The message could not be delivered to: Addressee: LLNLINFOVAX Reason: %MAIL-E-NOSUCHUSR, no such user LLNLINFOVAX at node ICDC ---------------------------------------- Sender: Postmaster%arpa.lll-icdc@uk.ac.ucl.cs The message could not be delivered to: Addressee: LLNLINFOVAX Reason: %MAIL-E-NOSUCHUSR, no such user LLNLINFOVAX at node ICDC ---------------------------------------- Sender: Postmaster%arpa.lll-icdc@uk.ac.ucl.cs The message could not be delivered to: Addressee: LLNLINFOVAX Reason: %MAIL-E-NOSUCHUSR, no such user LLNLINFOVAX at node ICDC ---------------------------------------- (-------Yes three identical error messages------------) Received: from earn.rutherford.ac.uk by NSS.Cs.Ucl.AC.UK via Janet with NIFTP id aa03450; 19 Oct 87 10:28 BST Original-Via: UK.AC.RL.EARN; Mon, 19 Oct 87 10:27:48 BST Received: from UKACRL by UK.AC.RL.IB (Mailer X1.25) with BSMTP id 4868; Mon, 19 Oct 87 10:27:48 BS Received: from JHUVM(MAILER) by UKACRL (Mailer X1.25) id 4867; Mon, 19 Oct 87 10:27:46 BS Received: by JHUVM (Mailer X1.25) id 8208; Mon, 19 Oct 87 05:22:33 EDT Date: Mon, 19 Oct 1987 05:22 EDT From: Revised List Processor (1.5l) Subject: Output of job "LISTSERV" from LISTSERV@PSUVM To: ABBOTTP Sender: LISTSERV%earn.jhuvm%earn.rl.ac.uk@uk.ac.rutherford.earn >>> To: E7OPDAN@TOWSONVX This node could not be found in the routing tables. Recipient has been ignored. Received: from earn.rutherford.ac.uk by NSS.Cs.Ucl.AC.UK via Janet with NIFTP id aa07301; 19 Oct 87 16:14 BST Original-Via: UK.AC.RL.EARN; Mon, 19 Oct 87 16:09:59 BST Received: from UKACRL by UK.AC.RL.IB (Mailer X1.25) with BSMTP id 1917; Mon, 19 Oct 87 16:09:59 BS Received: from UIUCVMD(MAILER) by UKACRL (Mailer X1.25) id 0537; Mon, 19 Oct 87 16:09:59 BS Received: by UIUCVMD (Mailer X1.25) id 7401; Mon, 19 Oct 87 09:52:07 CDT Date: Mon, 19 Oct 1987 09:52 CDT From: Revised List Processor (1.5l) Subject: Output of job "LISTSERV" from LISTSERV@TAMVM1 To: ABBOTTP Sender: LISTSERV%earn.uiucvmd%earn.rl.ac.uk@uk.ac.rutherford.earn >>> To: IMHW400@INDYVAX This node could not be found in the routing tables. Recipient has been ignored. I assume that the last two have been generated by the same info-vax message