Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!homxb!whuts!mtune!rutgers!ukma!uunet!mcvax!enea!sommar
From: sommar@enea.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
Subject: Re: VI in TPU part 14/14 (why not comp.sources.misc?)
Message-ID: <2430@enea.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 31-Oct-87 06:19:13 EST
Article-I.D.: enea.2430
Posted: Sat Oct 31 06:19:13 1987
Date-Received: Tue, 3-Nov-87 02:08:19 EST
Reply-To: sommar@enea.UUCP(Erland Sommarskog)
Followup-To: comp.os.vms
Organization: ENEA DATA Svenska AB, Sweden
Lines: 23

Larry Campbell (campbell@maynard.UUCP) suggests that Gregg should
have posted his source to comp.sources.misc. 

1) Gregg did post it to comp.sources.misc too as I recall.

2) Does comp.sources.misc go to ARPA, Bitnet and all the other
   nets that get Info-VAX? Isn't comp.sources.misc exclusively
   Usenet?
   
So what should be needed would something like Info-VAX-sources
(Called comp.sources.vms probably on Usenet.) But I think that is up 
to the ARPA/Bitnet people to decide. I read Info-VAX from Unix and 
don't get my mailbox filled by huge sources that I don't want.
   
Personally, I think Gregg was right in posting his sources. Although
I despise vi myself, I can easily imagine that his job is of interest
for many people that are used to Unix and don't like switching editor
when they are on VMS. 
-- 
Erland Sommarskog       
ENEA Data, Stockholm    
sommar@enea.UUCP        
                    It could have been worse; it could have been Pepsi.