Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!decwrl!labrea!bloom-beacon!think!maynard!campbell
From: campbell@maynard.BSW.COM (Larry Campbell)
Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
Subject: Re: VI in TPU part 14/14 (why not comp.sources.misc?)
Message-ID: <1009@maynard.BSW.COM>
Date: Thu, 29-Oct-87 23:21:01 EST
Article-I.D.: maynard.1009
Posted: Thu Oct 29 23:21:01 1987
Date-Received: Wed, 4-Nov-87 05:34:56 EST
References: <2727@okstate.UUCP> <[G.BBN.COM]26-Oct-87.10:20:16.WOLF> <1787@chinet.UUCP>
Reply-To: campbell@maynard.UUCP (Larry Campbell)
Organization: The Boston Software Works, Inc.
Lines: 18

In article <1787@chinet.UUCP> ignatz@chinet.UUCP (Dave Ihnat) writes:

<>                               ... There is no vms.sources group...
and
<>Yes, I'd agree that a vms source group is in order...

What about comp.sources.misc?  I have seen VMS software posted there --
in fact, wasn't VERB (which I find one of the most useful tidbits from
the net in a long time) posted there?

I agree with the original poster (Wolf) in substance, if not in tone.
comp.os.vms should be for discussions;  sources, ESPECIALLY gigantic
ones, should be in a sources group, and I think comp.sources.misc is
quite appropriate for that.
-- 
Larry Campbell                                The Boston Software Works, Inc.
Internet: campbell@maynard.bsw.com          120 Fulton Street, Boston MA 02109
uucp: {husc6,mirror,think}!maynard!campbell         +1 617 367 6846