Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!decwrl!ucbvax!TWG.ARPA!dcrocker From: dcrocker@TWG.ARPA ("Dave Crocker") Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip Subject: Re: supdup protocol Message-ID: <8710312151.AA27044@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> Date: Fri, 30-Oct-87 15:53:00 EST Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8710312151.AA27044 Posted: Fri Oct 30 15:53:00 1987 Date-Received: Thu, 5-Nov-87 04:10:06 EST Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: "Dave Crocker" Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 15 This is a couple of week's late, but Chris Kent cited a study of splitting the front and back ends of an editor. I, too, recall reading that study quite a few years ago. The basic concepts were quite straightforward, in terms that Chris described. In particular, I remember the researcher (no, I haven't the foggiest idea of who or where) was using 1200 baud and claimed an effective (subjective) 9600 baud for most activities. In the early days of Interactive Systems, with an intelligent terminal and tailored code added to it, they claimed highly effective interactions with 1200 baud lines, using the INed editor. This was circa 1978. Dave ------