Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!rick
From: rick@seismo.CSS.GOV (Rick Adams)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.d,news.groups
Subject: Re: arbitron program (v2.4.2--last updated 4 June 1987)
Message-ID: <44103@beno.seismo.CSS.GOV>
Date: Sun, 4-Oct-87 01:38:37 EDT
Article-I.D.: beno.44103
Posted: Sun Oct  4 01:38:37 1987
Date-Received: Wed, 7-Oct-87 02:47:30 EDT
References: <11731@decwrl.DEC.COM> <919@hao.UCAR.EDU> <14015@oddjob.UChicago.EDU>
Organization: Center for Seismic Studies, Arlington, VA
Lines: 8
Summary: alt.sources
Xref: mnetor comp.sources.d:1328 news.groups:1641

Yet one has to wonder: If alt.sources is "proof" of the need/demand for
unmoderated sources, why does one feel obligated to post to a group
specifically created for discussion only?

Is this an admission that alt.sources is inadequate? (Or maybe inappropriate?)
You would think it would at least be cross posted...

--rick