Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!think!bloom-beacon!oberon!cit-vax!ucla-cs!zen!ucbvax!sdcsvax!ucsdhub!hp-sdd!hplabs!sdcrdcf!trwrb!cadovax!gryphon!richard From: richard@gryphon.CTS.COM (Richard Sexton) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: StepRate ... a utility that makes your floppies FASTER! Message-ID: <1925@gryphon.CTS.COM> Date: Fri, 16-Oct-87 13:33:51 EDT Article-I.D.: gryphon.1925 Posted: Fri Oct 16 13:33:51 1987 Date-Received: Sun, 18-Oct-87 08:38:53 EDT References: More than one lines worth Reply-To: richard@gryphon.CTS.COM (Richard Sexton) Organization: Trailing Edge Technology, Redondo Beach, CA Lines: 35 Keywords: grinding noise pitch control benchmarks sausages maybe Summary: I feel like Peter and his Midi question In article <2499@cbmvax.UUCP> grr@cbmvax.UUCP (George Robbins) writes: >In article <1794@cadovax.UUCP> keithd@cadovax.UUCP (Keith Doyle) writes: >> >> Hey, Hey hey, my my. >> However, are we absolutely sure that running at a higher step rate will >> not cause a higher incidence of munged disks due to too marginal a >> setting? I'd love to try it, but no way until I am reasonably assured >> it isn't going to munch my critical 'C' source disks etc. > >That's the rub. By using the specified step rate or some slightly slower >amount, one can assume that things will be as reliable as you can get. > >Rather then mess around much with the floppy drives, I'd seriously consider >a hard drive, assuming you have the requisite $$$'s. It's a different >and better world. (snide comment) So is being filthy rich. >George Robbins Does this mean when the 68000 is finished issueing step pulses and it's about to do a read/write, it doesnt check to see if its on the track it should be/it thinks it's on ? How else could changing the *step rate* bugger up the data ? -- Richard J. Sexton INTERNET: richard@gryphon.CTS.COM UUCP: {hplabs!hp-sdd, sdcsvax, ihnp4, nosc}!crash!gryphon!richard "It's too dark to put the keys in my ignition..."