Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!pepper!cmcmanis
From: cmcmanis%pepper@Sun.COM (Chuck McManis)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Endless WaitIO() in VT100
Message-ID: <31678@sun.uucp>
Date: Thu, 22-Oct-87 14:01:10 EST
Article-I.D.: sun.31678
Posted: Thu Oct 22 14:01:10 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 25-Oct-87 03:22:50 EST
References: <16584@amdahl.amdahl.com> <31537@sun.uucp> <16749@amdahl.amdahl.com>
Sender: news@sun.uucp
Reply-To: cmcmanis@sun.UUCP (Chuck McManis)
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Mountain View
Lines: 13

In article <16749@amdahl.amdahl.com> (Tony Sumrall) writes:
>In article <31537@sun.uucp> cmcmanis@sun.UUCP (Chuck McManis) writes:
>>Actually, there is a definite race condition when you use AbortIO to 
> ^^^^^^^^---is this a statement of fact or opinion?

This was stated as a fact by the CATS staff on BIX. At the time the
context was calling the printer device, and it was later generalized
to all devices. 


--Chuck McManis
uucp: {anywhere}!sun!cmcmanis   BIX: cmcmanis  ARPAnet: cmcmanis@sun.com
These opinions are my own and no one elses, but you knew that didn't you.