Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!hao!ames!sdcsvax!ucsdhub!hp-sdd!hplabs!hp-pcd!hpcvc0!hpcvcd!charles
From: charles@hpcvcd.HP (Charles Brown)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Another A2000 Question (LP monitor smear?)
Message-ID: <4410012@hpcvcd.HP>
Date: Fri, 23-Oct-87 21:40:57 EST
Article-I.D.: hpcvcd.4410012
Posted: Fri Oct 23 21:40:57 1987
Date-Received: Mon, 26-Oct-87 01:49:37 EST
References: <177@tahoma.ARPA>
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Co., Corvallis, Oregon
Lines: 12

> I'm certainly not an expert on this subject, but I just can't see how
> 'eye persistence' has any bearing on the matter. Its the "now I'm
> here", "now I'm not" attribute of an interlaced display that causes
> the flicker, not the physiological response of the eye to color.
>	Richard J. Sexton

This is clearly not correct.  If it were true, then all people would
perceive flicker the same.  I see outrageous flicker where some people
see none.  I see ficker on televisions with ordinary shows, and on
movie theatre screens.  I see some flicker on my Sony monitor using my
A1000 without interlace.  All of this is quite uncomfortable.
	Charles (its in the eyes) Brown