Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!tektronix!decvax!ucbvax!ucbcad!ames!ptsfa!ihnp4!ihlpf!bird From: bird@ihlpf.ATT.COM (Walters) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple Subject: Re dabblers Message-ID: <2588@ihlpf.ATT.COM> Date: Sat, 24-Oct-87 22:42:41 EST Article-I.D.: ihlpf.2588 Posted: Sat Oct 24 22:42:41 1987 Date-Received: Tue, 27-Oct-87 02:49:47 EST Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories - Naperville, Illinois Lines: 147 Keywords: APDA I would like to address some of the points raised by the following: --------------------------------------------------------------------- >The reason for the cheap price for Merlin 8/16 is that APW/ORCA is >already the defacto standard development system for the Apple IIgs. Merlin sold for $64 when I first bought it as plain old Merlin. Merlin Pro was $99. The move to $125 seems in line with history and in no way addresss ORCA/M as a competitor. In addition, Merlin provides an assembler that works for both ProDOS and DOS 3.3 which can be viewed as "double for your money." >Merlin 8/16 is basically a slightly modified version of Merlin >Pro. It uses non-standard OP codes (like LDAL and STAL) If the latest Merlin doesn't use the syntax of ORCA/M, then I'm disappointed since that syntax seems extenable to the 32 bit version of the 6502. In the past Merlin has used such syntax to force the assembler to generate code for an addressing mode inconsistent with the address in the data field.