Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!decwrl!labrea!rutgers!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!tikal!amc!motsea From: motsea@amc.UUCP (Motorola Seattle ) Newsgroups: comp.sys.m68k Subject: Re: Fast 68000s? Message-ID: <541@amc.UUCP> Date: Fri, 30-Oct-87 13:59:43 EST Article-I.D.: amc.541 Posted: Fri Oct 30 13:59:43 1987 Date-Received: Wed, 4-Nov-87 23:24:46 EST References: <7487@dartvax.UUCP> <2649@cbmvax.UUCP> Reply-To: motsea@amc.UUCP (Motorola Seattle (guest account)) Organization: Applied Microsystems Corp., Redmond, WA. Lines: 36 In article <2649@cbmvax.UUCP> daveh@cbmvax.UUCP (Dave Haynie) writes: >in article <7487@dartvax.UUCP>, stevel@dartvax.UUCP (Steve Ligett) says: >> >> Why are there no 68000s faster than 12.5 MHz? > >Thompson makes a 16MHz 68000. A close look at the specs is appropriate in this case. You be the judge... >> Is it a marketing decision, or an engineering one? Does the 68HC000 use the >> same CMOS technology as the 68020? >Probably both. The NMOS 68000 can't likely be pushed any faster. The Motorola realizes the NMOS can't efficiently be pushed past 12.5 MHz, which is why we don't offer such a device. IF a sufficiently large market were to exist [or perhaps develops]for a 16 MHz 68k, the device that would be offered would be the CMOS version. It is mostly marketing decision... >Motorola let you settle for a 20MHz 68000 at $15.00, when they can sell you >a 20MHz 68020 for $300.00? 20MHz 68k's aren't likely, regardless of the cost, which would be more than $15, to be sure... >> Steve Ligett stevel@dartmouth.edu or >> (decvax harvard ihnp4 linus true)!dartvax!stevel >-- >Dave Haynie Commodore-Amiga Usenet: {ihnp4|caip|rutgers}!cbmvax!daveh > "The B2000 Guy" PLINK : D-DAVE H BIX : hazy > "Computers are what happen when you give up sleeping" - Iggy the Cat ...mark konopacky fae motorola seattle email: ...uw-beaver!tikal!motsea!mark [I am fortunate to use Applied Micro's system for news...] << Standard Disclaimer >>