Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!endor!singer
From: singer@endor.harvard.edu (Richard Siegel)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Intermail owners take note/Intermail buyers should read
Message-ID: <2990@husc6.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 13-Oct-87 20:19:44 EDT
Article-I.D.: husc6.2990
Posted: Tue Oct 13 20:19:44 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 15-Oct-87 04:46:19 EDT
References: <166@PT.CS.CMU.EDU>
Sender: news@husc6.UUCP
Reply-To: singer@endor.UUCP (Richard Siegel)
Organization: THINK Technologies, Inc., Bedford, MA
Lines: 30

In article <166@PT.CS.CMU.EDU> fitz@CIVE.RI.CMU.EDU (Kerien Fitzpatrick) writes:
>I would love to have Inbox, but since they don't site license I would have
>to purchase another copy every time a Mac is added to the network.  Maybe
>Inbox should think about site licensing their product.  What I liked the

	It is true that we don't site-license InBox (or any of our other
products for that matter), however, we do offer quantity discounts on our
various products. I don't know the terms exactly (I'm customer support
for compilers :-)), but if you call Ellen Neavitt at 1-800-64-THINK she
will give you the details. And mention my name when you call... :-)

>
>Is there anyone from Inbox out there who will take pity on a distraught
>person who, besides his own research work, manages a network of 32 Macs, a
>couple file servers, gateway boxes, and on and on.

	InBox version 2.0 will work concurrently with AppleShare and TOPS,
and also works nicely with bridges (we have two Message Centers with two
Hayes InterBridges) and with all flavors of Macintosh and network (our
net is PhoneNet based).

		--Rich


**The opinions stated herein are my own opinions and do not necessarily
represent the policies or opinions of my employer (THINK Technologies, Inc).

* Richard M. Siegel | {decvax, ucbvax, sun}!harvard!endor!singer    *
* Customer Support  | singer@endor.harvard.edu			    *
* THINK Technologies, Inc.  (No snappy daibuvicesir p, Aus
anglacyears