Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!endor!singer
From: singer@endor.harvard.edu (Richard Siegel)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Intermail shaft is complete
Message-ID: <3002@husc6.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 14-Oct-87 22:02:59 EDT
Article-I.D.: husc6.3002
Posted: Wed Oct 14 22:02:59 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 16-Oct-87 06:46:21 EDT
References: <173@PT.CS.CMU.EDU>
Sender: news@husc6.UUCP
Reply-To: singer@endor.UUCP (Richard Siegel)
Organization: THINK Technologies, Inc., Bedford, MA
Lines: 23

In article <173@PT.CS.CMU.EDU> fitz@CIVE.RI.CMU.EDU (Kerien Fitzpatrick) writes:

>With the recent developments, I decided to take a first-hand look at Inbox.
>I saw a version with three connections and the response was sooooo slow I
>thought the machine had hung.  It looks to me like the Mac-based email is a

	That's interesting. I've been using a Mac SE on an AppleTalk
net consisting of two message centers, about 40 Macs, and
two Hayes InterBridge units. The response was never slow enough to
make me thing the machine was hung up.

	Tell me more about the net; was the MC running in the background
with something else (AppleShare, for example)? Response is very good
when the MC is foreground.

		--Rich

**The opinions stated herein are my own opinions and do not necessarily
represent the policies or opinions of my employer (THINK Technologies, Inc).

* Richard M. Siegel | {decvax, ucbvax, sun}!harvard!endor!singer    *
* Customer Support  | singer@endor.harvard.edu			    *
* THINK Technologies, Inc.  (No snappy quote)                       *