Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!decwrl!decvax!dartvax!merchant From: merchant@dartvax.UUCP (Peter Merchant) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: BYTE MAG (We don't even rate...) Message-ID: <7528@dartvax.UUCP> Date: Sat, 31-Oct-87 14:59:43 EST Article-I.D.: dartvax.7528 Posted: Sat Oct 31 14:59:43 1987 Date-Received: Thu, 5-Nov-87 06:44:35 EST References: <12346169899024@G.BBN.COM> Organization: U.S. Merchant Marine Academy, Kings Point, NY Lines: 30 In article <12346169899024@G.BBN.COM>, DREDICK@G.BBN.COM (Donald Redick) writes: > I have subscribed to BYTE for the last 10 years... It is a tradition > with me. But of late, (as if you haven't noticed) it has turned into > a mouthpiece for the IBM Clan.. > > "..In this case, the author based his report on experiences with a late > beta version of Multifinder, lengthy talks with APPLE programmers, and > APPLE documents. IF interest warrants, BYTE will formally review this > product at a latter date." > -- Novemeber issue of Byte > > Hey, If it had been the Lastest verion of OS/2 you betcha it would > get the biggest review possible. But just look what we got.. Oh, I don't think it's quite that bad... Byte likes to show off "product previews", which they claim are not reviews. I think this is probably their new disclaimer, because some of their product previews, all of which claim that "This is a product preview. A formal review of this product will appear in later issues", don't get a later review because no one wants to do it. Or, sometimes, it takes quite some time. For example, Data General's laptop machine got a front cover product preview. The review came about a year-and-a-half later. But, hey, let's be honest with ourselves. What is the ratio of installed PC/MS-DOS systems to Macintosh systems? Even more curious, what is the ratio of installed '286 MS-DOS systems (ie, stuff that'll run OS/2) to Macintosh systems? -- "Quantity, not quality." Peter Merchant (merchant@dartvax.UUCP)