Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!rutgers!sri-spam!mordor!lll-lcc!ames!hc!beta!cmcl2!phri!dasys1!msmith
From: msmith@dasys1.UUCP (Mark E. Smith)
Newsgroups: news.admin,misc.legal
Subject: Re: Responsibility for postings.
Message-ID: <1790@dasys1.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 24-Oct-87 03:53:45 EST
Article-I.D.: dasys1.1790
Posted: Sat Oct 24 03:53:45 1987
Date-Received: Tue, 27-Oct-87 01:45:30 EST
References: <4611@videovax.Tek.COM> <2294@umn-cs.UUCP> <1606@dasys1.UUCP> <8499@sri-unix.ARPA> <2140@kitty.UUCP> <1592@epimass.EPI.COM>
Reply-To: msmith@dasys1.UUCP (Mark Ethan Smith)
Followup-To: soc.women
Organization: The Big Electric Cat
Lines: 23
Summary: Correction
Xref: mnetor news.admin:1254 misc.legal:3319

In article <1592@epimass.EPI.COM> jbuck@epimass.EPI.COM (Joe Buck) writes:
>Mark has been booted off three different systems (well, m-net, and
>chinet), and is now being subjected to a campaign by you to get the

The third system I was booted off was not m-net.  And I wasn't
booted off it, just denied permission to post to soc.women from
that system.  I stopped accessing m-net due to the large number
of attacks on me there, but last time I checked I still had access
and if I were willing to submit to attacks and to try to defend 
myself against more than 20 attacks a day, Mike Myers would be
happy to stand back and watch.  He refused many demands to pull my
password, while personally disagreeing with much that I said, and I
know Mike and m-net to be free of censorship.  As for that 3rd system,
the SA felt that the heat directed against me would be directed
against him if he continued to let me post, and I understand his
position, empathize, and only wish that people who disagree with me
would stop blaming the SA's and threatening legal action against sites.

--Mark
-- 
Mark Ethan Smith                    {allegra,philabs,cmcl2}!phri\
Big Electric Cat Public Unix           {bellcore,cmcl2}!cucard!dasys1!msmith
New York, NY, USA                                {philabs}!tg/