Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!beta!hc!ames!oliveb!jerry
From: jerry@oliveb.UUCP (Jerry Aguirre)
Newsgroups: misc.misc,news.admin,news.groups,news.misc,rec.autos,rec.aviation,rec.boats,rec.misc
Subject: Re: New RC-modeling news-group
Message-ID: <7303@oliveb.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 19-Oct-87 17:47:24 EDT
Article-I.D.: oliveb.7303
Posted: Mon Oct 19 17:47:24 1987
Date-Received: Wed, 21-Oct-87 00:59:58 EDT
References: <806@obiwan.UUCP>
Reply-To: jerry@oliveb.UUCP (Jerry Aguirre)
Organization: Olivetti ATC; Cupertino, Ca
Lines: 16
Keywords: RC modeling
Xref: mnetor misc.misc:1952 news.admin:1202 news.groups:1749 news.misc:1046 rec.autos:6162 rec.aviation:4479 rec.boats:405 rec.misc:525

In article <806@obiwan.UUCP> freeptos@mips.UUCP (Dan Freitas) writes:
>	Most of the comments about the name were that "rec.RC" is not 
>    	descriptive enough.  Fair enough, how about rec.rc.modeling.

Right :-)  Then if we want to add more groups later we can have:
	rec.rc.fullsize
	rec.rc.cola
	rec.rc.....

Seriously, in terms of recreation, isn't RC a subdivision of modeling
rather than the opposite?  I suggest that you move towards "rec.model"
(or "rec.modeling" if you like to type a lot).  It can be a place for
general discussions of model airplanes, cars, etc. (But no railroad, see
"rec.railroad.)  Then if the RC portion of modeling needs its own group
you can split off "rec.model.rc" later.
				Jerry Aguirre