Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!brl-adm!brl-smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn )
Newsgroups: sci.crypt
Subject: Re: An interesting message from SECURITY-DIGEST@RUTGERS
Message-ID: <6563@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Date: Tue, 13-Oct-87 17:29:11 EDT
Article-I.D.: brl-smok.6563
Posted: Tue Oct 13 17:29:11 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 15-Oct-87 03:40:03 EDT
References: <7449@reed.UUCP> <8746@utzoo.UUCP> <471@auscso.UUCP>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>)
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 11

In article <471@auscso.UUCP> johnm@auscso.UUCP (John B. Meaders, Jr.) writes:
-If they are so against it, they must be doing something illegal.  There is
-a price to pay for freedom, and that means Uncle Sam must monitor overseas
-traffic and some domestic traffic to make sure involved parties aren't
-doing things that jeopardize our security.  Please direct all flames to
-/dev/null because if you aren't willing to give up something for freedom,
-I don't want to here from you.

I think many people do not believe that privacy, or the principle of
"innocent until proven guilty", or "due process", must necessarily
be surrendered in the name of freedom.