Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!husc6!hao!oddjob!gargoyle!ihnp4!homxb!homxc!marcula From: marcula@homxc.UUCP Newsgroups: sci.misc,rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Watch for THE RING OF TRUTH on PBS Message-ID: <1832@homxc.UUCP> Date: Thu, 22-Oct-87 12:52:17 EST Article-I.D.: homxc.1832 Posted: Thu Oct 22 12:52:17 1987 Date-Received: Sun, 25-Oct-87 07:58:27 EST References: <1987Oct13.230923.20975@sq.uucp> <1336@ilium.swatsun.UUCP> Distribution: na Organization: Nola's Lines: 35 Xref: utgpu sci.misc:534 rec.arts.tv:3523 Summary: popularizing physics for people like me In article <1336@ilium.swatsun.UUCP>, hirai@swatsun (Eiji "A.G." Hirai) writes: > In article <1987Oct13.230923.20975@sq.uucp> msb@sq.uucp (Mark Brader) writes: > > > ># Tuesday, October 20 > ># 9 pm: RING OF TRUTH -- Science; 60 min. > > I desperately hope that this series will not be as bad as another > science program that PBS showed recently. I do not remember the exact title > but the program attempted to show some theories on the various fundamental > forces in the Universe. It had the narrator climbing up a light tower > and opening windows when explaining the march back in time to the beginning > of the Universe. The show was called "Creation of the Universe". I thought it was not all that bad esp. since the subject really hadn't been approached in an hour T.V. show before. I don't think it was intended for the heavy weights of physics but as a layperson I thought it was reasonable alternative from the normal bull on network T.V. I'm happy that these subjects are being addressed. Things like Cosmos, Nova, and various other science productions via PBS are absolutely great. > > The show lacked any depth for those who were Physics majors or > were knowledgeable about the field of quantum physics, and was bery confusing > for those who were not. Either way, you lost out. See the above. > > Now, this is not an attack on PBS (I love them!) but just a hopeful > prayer that this series will offer something to at least the layman or > the knowledgeble person, or perhaps to both. Shows like the Creation of the Universe are not very easy to do But they are relative easy to get funding for. There is not a lot of experience in the production of these type of shows. Unlike the Soaps, Sitcoms, and stuff like that. I am sure you would be an excellent candidate to produce a original and decent science show. I know I am gonna give it a try. By the way, I missed "The Ring of Truth. Hopefully, I'll get a chance to see it.