Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!mcvax!ukc!eagle!rjf From: rjf@eagle.ukc.ac.uk (Robin Faichney) Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech Subject: Re: I am still alive - Biep. Message-ID: <3444@eagle.ukc.ac.uk> Date: Wed, 28-Oct-87 11:16:25 EST Article-I.D.: eagle.3444 Posted: Wed Oct 28 11:16:25 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 31-Oct-87 13:56:23 EST References: <931@klipper.cs.vu.nl> Reply-To: rjf@ukc.ac.uk (Robin Faichney) Organization: Computing Lab, University of Kent at Canterbury, UK. Lines: 30 Summary: Expires: Sender: Followup-To: In article <931@klipper.cs.vu.nl> biep@cs.vu.nl (J. A. "Biep" Durieux) writes: >[..] >BTW, It seems that at the moment I left the discussion, it died. I others >want to continue it, pleas try to give your definition of "methodology". >Many have said mine was incorrect, but none offered an alternative. Concise Oxford English Dictionary: methodology n. Science of method; body of methods used in a particular branch of activity;.. I had decided, apparently like many others, to give up on this, but was stung into reaction, because I sent this definition to Biep many weeks ago, and if I remember correctly he commented on other things in the same message, so must have gotten it. Also, of course, others were saying much the same at that time. We seem to be agreed that `science of method' is one meaning. But `body of methods..' is *MUCH* weaker than Biep seems to be happy with. I can't even remember now what the implications of this are, for anything else Biep says, but I couldn't let this go past. Also, Biep, you posted an impressive list of things you thought were implied by the word, and asked for suggestions for specific changes, from anyone who disagreed. But where we are saying that your definition is too narrow, our only response must be general: your list is too restrictive, and any list which was adequate would probably take a life's work to produce. So now, Biep, the ball is in your court: what is wrong with the OED definition? Robin rjf@ukc.ac.uk