Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!hoptoad!ptsfa!ames!ll-xn!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!tektronix!reed!mojo
From: mojo@reed.UUCP
Newsgroups: misc.legal,alt.flame
Subject: Re: No more legalization talk on alt.drugs
Message-ID: <7625@reed.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 3-Nov-87 16:18:50 EST
Article-I.D.: reed.7625
Posted: Tue Nov  3 16:18:50 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 6-Nov-87 06:47:10 EST
References: <24042COK@PSUVMA>
Reply-To: mojo@reed.UUCP (Soon to be a Major Motion Picture)
Organization: The Phrench Phry Contingency
Lines: 25
Xref: hoptoad misc.legal:3305 alt.flame:500

In article <24042COK@PSUVMA> COK@PSUVMA.BITNET (R. W. Clark, K. S. C.) writes:
>You'll note I limited followups to this article to misc.legal and alt.flame.
>I have come to agree with most of the people on alt.drugs that pro-legalization
>is a topic for misc.legal, not alt.drugs.

I agree.  This discussion isn't likely to go anywhere; very few opinions are
likely to change, and I haven't seen any new information floating around for
some time.

Let's stop arguing legalization on alt.drugs.  If there's enough demand, maybe
someone could start an alt.legalization or some such.

>BITNET: cok%psuvma.bitnet@psuvax1.psu.edu
>    or  cok%psuvma.bitnet@psuvax1.uucp
>     


	"I did not come here to be insulted."
	"That's what you think."
		- *Duck Soup*
-- 
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\A tautology is a thing   \ Nathan Tenny            /  The opinions expressed/
/which is tautological.   / ...tektronix!reed!mojo  \  may not even be mine. \
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ FLAMES ANSWERED WITH NAPALM /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/