Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bbn!rochester!ray
From: ray@cs.rochester.edu (Ray Frank)
Newsgroups: misc.legal,alt.flame
Subject: Re: Can we legalize? (drug laws support rightist underground)
Message-ID: <4191@sol.ARPA>
Date: Fri, 13-Nov-87 10:44:08 EST
Article-I.D.: sol.4191
Posted: Fri Nov 13 10:44:08 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 15-Nov-87 08:23:56 EST
References: <1220@laidbak.UUCP> <620@auscso.UUCP> <21617@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <4050@sol.ARPA> <316@gethen.UUCP>
Reply-To: ray@cs.rochester.edu (Ray Frank)
Organization: U of Rochester, CS Dept, Rochester, NY
Lines: 18
Xref: mnetor misc.legal:3896 alt.flame:553

In article <316@gethen.UUCP> farren@gethen.UUCP (Michael J. Farren) writes:
>
>Why not get real, Ray?  If you're going to spin tall tales, that's probably
>fine, but if you're going to expect us to accept them as fact, you'd better
>do a little substantiation.  And Reader's Digest doesn't count as an
>"authoritative source", sorry.
>----------------
>Michael J. Farren      "... if the church put in half the time on covetousness

Hey, what's the probnem.  If the left-wingers can have fun spinning tall tales
of conspiracy why can't the right-wingers?  And since the left-wingers are
having so much fun with their conspiracy tales about how the CIA and most
right-wingers secretly keep the drug traffic flourishing, and substantiation
would be too much trouble for them and not nearly as much fun, I felt I
shouldn't have to substantiate my tales either.


ray