Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!uwvax!speedy!honavar
From: honavar@speedy.WISC.EDU (A Buggy AI Program)
Newsgroups: comp.ai
Subject: Re: Who owns the output of an AI? (actually wonders of rn)
Message-ID: <4657@spool.wisc.edu>
Date: Sat, 14-Nov-87 07:27:59 EST
Article-I.D.: spool.4657
Posted: Sat Nov 14 07:27:59 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 15-Nov-87 17:14:41 EST
References: <1778@svax.cs.cornell.edu> <4631@spool.wisc.edu> <1412@houdi.UUCP>
Sender: news@spool.wisc.edu
Reply-To: honavar@speedy.WISC.EDU (A Buggy AI Program)
Organization: U of Wisconsin CS Dept
Lines: 23

In article <1412@houdi.UUCP> marty1@houdi.UUCP (M.BRILLIANT) writes:

>In article <4631@spool.wisc.edu>, honavar@speedy.WISC.EDU (A Buggy AI Program)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^	^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
writes:
>> In article <1778@svax.cs.cornell.edu> houpt@svax.cs.cornell.edu (Charles (Chuck) Houpt) writes:
>> >   The law says that the output of an AI is owned by the user running the
>> >AI, NOT the programmer who designed it.
>> > ....
>> > ... To me the British law seems unfair.....
>
>It's just like the law governing real intelligence. 
> ......
>
>M. B. Brilliant					Marty
>AT&T-BL HO 3D-520	(201)-949-1858
>Holmdel, NJ 07733	ihnp4!houdi!marty1

It's probably about time some AI was put into the news software so that it can
make sure that the pieces of article/s quoted are really from the authors 
to whom the quotes attributed.

--VGH