Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!ssc-vax!bcsaic!rwojcik From: rwojcik@bcsaic.UUCP (Rick Wojcik) Newsgroups: comp.ai Subject: Re: Language Learning Message-ID: <2775@bcsaic.UUCP> Date: Mon, 16-Nov-87 11:34:57 EST Article-I.D.: bcsaic.2775 Posted: Mon Nov 16 11:34:57 1987 Date-Received: Thu, 19-Nov-87 22:07:23 EST References: <8986@shemp.UCLA.EDU> <1125@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> <1966@uwmacc.UUCP> <1409@houdi.UUCP> <1410@houdi.UUCP> Reply-To: rwojcik@bcsaic.UUCP (Rick Wojcik) Followup-To: sci.lang Organization: Boeing Computer Services AI Center, Seattle Lines: 33 Keywords: Hindsight, Phonology Summary: Phonology is tied to muscular coordination. In article <1410@houdi.UUCP> marty1@houdi.UUCP (M.BRILLIANT) writes: > >Professionals in language learning speak now of a "sensitive" >period, rather than a "critical" period, and specifically with >reference to phonology. > Maybe I have just lost touch with what is going on in the literature. What language professionals are you talking about? What is the difference between a "sensitive" period and a "critical" period? There is rather overwhelming evidence that language learning is tied biological maturation. Not only is there the fact that foreign accent (phonological accent, i.e.) doesn't go away after puberty, but there is also evidence from language disorders. People who suffer aphasia from left-side brain damage can often recover articulation before puberty. After puberty, chances of total recovery are slim, if at all possible. It may not be the case that the critical period for syntax is the same as that for phonology. The "Joseph Conrad Phenomenon" is a case in point. It is impossible to tell from Conrad's writing that his native language was Polish. However, he pronounced English with a foreign accent. This was the apparent result of his having learned English during his teen years. I believe that Tom Bever came up with a threshold of around 17 to 19 years for syntax, but I do not recall the study in which he made this claim. In any case, the difference between phonological acquisition and other aspects of acquisition should not be surprising. Phonology is intimately tied to muscular coordination, whereas syntax is not. This is why the acquisition of dance and musical instruments runs parallel to phonological accent. Rick Wojcik RWOJCIK@BOEING.COM