Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site dciem.UUCP Path: utzoo!dciem!mmt From: mmt@dciem.UUCP (Martin Taylor) Newsgroups: comp.ai Subject: Re: Practical effects of AI (speech) Message-ID: <2543@dciem.UUCP> Date: Wed, 18-Nov-87 18:14:14 EST Article-I.D.: dciem.2543 Posted: Wed Nov 18 18:14:14 1987 Date-Received: Fri, 20-Nov-87 23:42:22 EST References: <12@gollum.Columbia.NCR.COM> <267@PT.CS.CMU.EDU> <244@usl-pc.UUCP> <1126@uhccux.UUCP> Reply-To: mmt@dciem.UUCP (Martin Taylor) Organization: D.C.I.E.M., Toronto, Canada Lines: 38 Keywords: ai future effects Summary: -- I suppose that applying AI to speech recognition would involve --making use of what we know about the perceptual and cognitive nature --of language sound-structures -- i.e. the results of phonology. I don't --know that this has ever been tried. If it has, could someone supply --references? I'd be very interested to know what has been done in this --direction. -- Greg Lee, lee@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu I have been unable in a quick search to come up with exact references, but Alinat, working at Thomson-DASM in Cros-de-Cagnes, France, has had quite successful results using the phonological structure of French as his basic database. As I remember it, he does a quick-and-dirty analysis of the phonetic structure of the incoming speech signal (classes in order of preference), and then uses fairly complex phonotactic rules along with the (fairly strict) syntax of the permitted sentence structure to produce rather good talker-independent results for native French talkers. Non-native but reasonably fluent talkers are not well recognized, probably because they don't conform to the French phonotactic rules. Alinat was working essentially alone for a long time, but I understand he is now cooperating with CRIN at the University of Nancy. All the above is from memory, so details may be wrong. If I find the references, I'll post them. If you are really interested, you should be able to get hold of Alinat from the information above (except I'm not sure whether it may be Cagnes-sur-Mer rather than Cros de Cagnes; they are contiguous). -- Martin Taylor {allegra,linus,ihnp4,floyd,ubc-vision}!utzoo!dciem!mmt {uw-beaver,qucis,watmath}!utcsri!dciem!mmt mmt@zorac.arpa Magic is just advanced technology ... so is intelligence. Before computers, the ability to do arithmetic was proof of intelligence. What proves intelligence now?