Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!amdcad!ames!sdcsvax!nosc!humu!uhccux!lee From: lee@uhccux.UUCP (Greg Lee) Newsgroups: sci.lang,comp.ai Subject: Re: Langendoen and Postal (posted by: Berke) Message-ID: <1054@uhccux.UUCP> Date: Tue, 3-Nov-87 06:42:00 EST Article-I.D.: uhccux.1054 Posted: Tue Nov 3 06:42:00 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 7-Nov-87 04:08:40 EST References: <8941@shemp.UCLA.EDU> <9445@ut-sally.UUCP> Reply-To: lee@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu (Greg Lee) Organization: U. of Hawaii, Manoa (Honolulu) Lines: 33 Summary: sentences infinite, length finite Xref: mnetor sci.lang:1644 comp.ai:1051 In article <9445@ut-sally.UUCP> turpin@ut-sally.UUCP (Russell Turpin) writes: >In article <8941@shemp.UCLA.EDU>, berke@CS.UCLA.EDU writes: >> I just read this fabulous book over the weekend, called "The Vastness >> of Natural Languages," by D. Terence Langendoen and Paul M. Postal. >> ... > >Let me switch contexts. I have not read the above-mentioned book, >but it seems to me that this claim is just plain wrong. I would > ... >also excludes infinite languages. The reason is that there will >never be more than a finite number of people (ET's included), and > ... >Russell Although the number of sentences in a natural language might be finite, the most appropriate model for human language processing might reasonably assume the contrary. Suppose, for instance, that we wish to compare the complexities of various languages with regard to how easily they could be used by humans, and that we take the number of phrase structure rules in a phrase structure grammar as a measure of such complexity. A grammar to generate 100,000 sentences of the pattern "Oh boy, oh boy, ...!" would be much more complex than a grammar to generate an infinite number of such sentences. And the pattern seems easy enough to learn ... Concerning the length of sentences, I think Postal and Langendoen are not very persuasive. Most of their arguments are to the effect that previously given attempted demonstrations that sentences cannot be of infinite length are incorrect. I think they make that point very well. But obviously this is not enough To show that one should assume some sentences of infinite length. Greg Lee, lee@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu