Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ucbvax!aragorn.cm.deakin.OZ.AU!eric From: eric@aragorn.cm.deakin.OZ.AU.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.ai.digest Subject: Re: Exp. Sys. Benchmarking Query Message-ID: <8711192245.AA09427@uunet.UU.NET> Date: Thu, 19-Nov-87 18:03:27 EST Article-I.D.: uunet.8711192245.AA09427 Posted: Thu Nov 19 18:03:27 1987 Date-Received: Wed, 25-Nov-87 22:03:36 EST References: <563694555.0.LPRESS@VENERA.ISI.EDU> Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: aragorn!eric (Eric Y.H. Tsui) Distribution: world Organization: Division of Computing and Mathematics - Deakin University Lines: 27 Keywords: expert systems evaluation shells tools Approved: ailist@kl.sri.com In article <563694555.0.LPRESS@VENERA.ISI.EDU> LPRESS@VENERA.ISI.EDU (Laurence I. Press) writes: >Can anyone supply pointers to papers on benchmarking and performance >evaluation for expert system shells? > >I have written a short program that generates stylized rule bases of >a specified length and have used it to generate comparative test cases >for PC Plus and M1. I'd be happy to give anyone a copy and would like >to learn of other efforts to compare expert system shells. > >Larry >------- On evaluation of Expert System tools, see J.F. Gilmore, K. Pulaski and C. Howard, A Comprehensive evaluation of expert system tools, Applications of AI III, J.F. Gilmore, Editor, Proc. 635, p2-16. (The above group has published a few papers on the evaluation of ES and the above paper is only a recent one of many from them.) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eric Tsui >> CSNET:eric@aragorn.oz << Division of Comp./Maths.>> UUCP: seismo!munnari!aragorn.oz!eric << Deakin University >> decvax!mulga!aragorn.oz!eric << Victoria 3217 >> ARPA: munnari!aragorn.oz!eric@seismo.arpa << Australia >> decvax!mulga!aragorn.oz!eric@Berkeley << ---------------------------------------------------------------------------