Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!ukma!nrl-cmf!ames!ptsfa!dmt
From: dmt@ptsfa.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Horizontal pipelining
Message-ID: <3801@ptsfa.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 20-Nov-87 20:17:22 EST
Article-I.D.: ptsfa.3801
Posted: Fri Nov 20 20:17:22 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 22-Nov-87 16:58:48 EST
References: <201@PT.CS.CMU.EDU> <388@sdcjove.CAM.UNISYS.COM> <988@edge.UUCP> <393@sdcjove.CAM.UNISYS.COM>
Reply-To: dmt@ptsfa.UUCP (Dave Turner)
Organization: Pacific * Bell, San Ramon, CA
Lines: 17
Keywords: multiple users

In article <393@sdcjove.CAM.UNISYS.COM> mrc@CAM.UNISYS.COM (Ken Leonard --> ken@oahu.mcl.unisys.com@sdcjove.cam.unisys.com) writes:
>In article <988@edge.UUCP> doug@edge.UUCP (Doug Pardee) writes:
>>OS/MFT became (was the basis for) OS/VS1.  OS/MVT was the basis for OS/VS2.
>>Release 2 of OS/VS2 was the first MVS.  Inevitably, OS/VS2 Release 1 became
>>known to history as SVS.
>

I thought that OS/VS1 was called SVS.

Locally, we called VS1, SVS and VS2 (release 1), MVS right from the start.
IBM didn't like the labels. Finally, they called OS/VS2 Release 2, MVS.




-- 
Dave Turner	415/542-1299	{ihnp4,lll-crg,qantel,pyramid}!ptsfa!dmt