Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!steinmetz!davidsen
From: davidsen@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP (William E. Davidsen Jr)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: MultiTechModems
Message-ID: <7836@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 12-Nov-87 10:56:06 EST
Article-I.D.: steinmet.7836
Posted: Thu Nov 12 10:56:06 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 15-Nov-87 02:32:39 EST
References: <468@hscfvax.UUCP>
Reply-To: davidsen@kbsvax.steinmetz.UUCP (William E. Davidsen Jr)
Organization: General Electric CRD, Schenectady, NY
Lines: 20

In article <468@hscfvax.UUCP> pavlov@hscfvax.UUCP (840033@G.Pavlov) writes:
>
> Request for input:
>
> I am considering purchasing Multitech's 2400 baud modems (224's) to serve on
> the dial-in ports of a uVAX system (via a Micom port selector).  My major rea-
> son for purchasing 2400-baud units is to provide better noise "supppresion"
> for our dial-in users, most of which are using 1200-baud Hayes units.

We are using Multi-Tech and have been very happy with them.  We have
over a hundred (I suspect way over, but I don't have the figures), and
we have been very happy with them.  They seem to be more Hayes
compatible than Hayes 2400, since you have the option of not generating
a bunch of "enhanced" messages.  I don't know if they're the best, but
they have been very good for us. 

-- 
	bill davidsen		(wedu@ge-crd.arpa)
  {uunet | philabs | seismo}!steinmetz!crdos1!davidsen
"Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward" -me