Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!ukma!psuvm.bitnet!cunyvm!unknown
From: rrk@byuvax.bitnet
Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
Subject: RE: local area vaxcluster performance
Message-ID: <13rrk@byuvax.bitnet>
Date: Wed, 28-Oct-87 23:17:18 EST
Article-I.D.: byuvax.13rrk
Posted: Wed Oct 28 23:17:18 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 7-Nov-87 06:45:37 EST
Lines: 7

Check your Ethernet device:  DEC didn't tell us until AFTER we installed
our LAVC that a Deuna is insufficient and inefficient.  But even after we
after-the-fact upgraded to a DEBNA, the performance still didn't get much
better (partly because of a dual CPU restriction) and we found out we have
more throughput on a stand-alone 8350 than with 3 micro-VAX II's clustered
in.