Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!decwrl!ucbvax!BBNG!WOLF From: WOLF@BBNG (Jerry Wolf) Newsgroups: comp.os.vms Subject: Re: VI in TPU part 14/14 (AND ALL SUCH SUBMISSIONS!) Message-ID: <[G.BBN.COM].2-Nov-87.11:17:01.WOLF> Date: Mon, 2-Nov-87 11:17:00 EST Article-I.D.: <[G.BBN.COM].2-Nov-87.11:17:01.WOLF> Posted: Mon Nov 2 11:17:00 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 7-Nov-87 18:59:32 EST References: <1787@chinet.UUCP> Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 37 Last week I sent out a message that began: > I would like to protest the distribution to the entire INFO-VAX > list of LARGE program sources such as the recent "VI in TPU" that > hit our machine this past weekend. Let me be more specific (and perhaps take back the word "protest" in favor of "suggesting otherwise"). I don't wish to inhibit sharing software on IFNO_VAX or anywhere else, and my complaint/suggestion has nothing to do with the QUALITY of programs that are submitted group-wide, just the SIZE, as I believe I pointed out. Those giant messages, arriving unbidden, darn near ran me out of disk quota (and would have, had I not happened to log in on the weekend and delete them in time). Who knows what havoc they wreaked to other hapless recipients? My suggestion is merely that authors of LARGE things they wish to share send a message to all to the effect that" "I have a neat program that does X. It is written in Y, and it requires system resources Z. It is about W kilocharacters long. If you're interested in receiving it, reply to me." I WOULD appreciate receiving such messages and replying to receive those programs that look useful to our system or even just interesting to me. That way, everybody gets a chance to see what's being offered for sharing and the data gets transmitted only to those who want/need it. Doesn't seem to me there's a need for a separate sources group. OK, my suggestion does embody a size threshold -- i.e., when is a submission small enough to submit to the entire group? I don't have any strong opinions about this; I'd be happy simply having submitters just ask themselves that question before going ahead and sending the whole shebang. Perhaps if it's too big to send in one message, you should ask first? Cheers, Jerry Wolf BBN Laboratories Incorporated