Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!mcnc!decvax!decwrl!ucbvax!G.BBN.COM!CLYNN
From: CLYNN@G.BBN.COM.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: details on misbehaving IP implementations
Message-ID: <[G.BBN.COM].5-Nov-87.09:58:35.CLYNN>
Date: Thu, 5-Nov-87 09:58:00 EST
Article-I.D.: <[G.BBN.COM].5-Nov-87.09:58:35.CLYNN>
Posted: Thu Nov  5 09:58:00 1987
Date-Received: Tue, 10-Nov-87 03:01:46 EST
References: <1512@faline.bellcore.com>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 8

Phil,
	I think that 2 and 3 (returning port unreachable) are not bugs but
are actually doing what the spec says they should.
	4 (returning protocol unreachable in response to broadcasts) is
probably not a good idea, but the specs were written before broadcast
were widely used.

Charlie