Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!hao!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!ETN-WLV.EATON.COM!mcc
From: mcc@ETN-WLV.EATON.COM (Merton Campbell Crockett)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: Re:  IP encapsulation over ARCnet
Message-ID: <8711162336.AA02326@etn-wlv.EATON.COM>
Date: Mon, 16-Nov-87 18:36:20 EST
Article-I.D.: etn-wlv.8711162336.AA02326
Posted: Mon Nov 16 18:36:20 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 19-Nov-87 00:08:38 EST
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 12

Saw the message once--didn't need to see it again.  I don't know which is worse-
-messages taking forever to traverse the network or receiving the same message
twice.  Why don't we make all message traffic slow (Electronic Snail) and then
eliminate the redundancy feature.

Perhaps I should "biff n" to avoid the "Noyed".  Maybe we should add a new
item to the TCP/IP jargon list:

	Noyed (n):  duplicate message or packet.
	Annoyed (v): the feeling one gets when one receives a noyed.

Merton Campbell Crockett