Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!rutgers!bellcore!faline!ulysses!ucbvax!UMD5.UMD.EDU!jac
From: jac@UMD5.UMD.EDU ("Joseph A. Cimmino Jr.")
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: Re: standard interface
Message-ID: <8711060326.AA01376@umd5.UMD.EDU>
Date: Thu, 5-Nov-87 22:26:49 EST
Article-I.D.: umd5.8711060326.AA01376
Posted: Thu Nov  5 22:26:49 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 8-Nov-87 11:39:10 EST
References: <wVYGO8y00UoJytM1ca@andrew.cmu.edu>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 11

Yes, a BOF in December would be a great time to discuss the issues.

Re a common socket interface:  Are you supposing TSR'd socket support?
Only then can we discuss an interrupt interface, however having the
entire stack (hardware to sockets) loaded might be considered unreasonable
memory overhead to some.  I'd like to hear more about what options for
socket support are envisioned.

Along those lines, maybe we could also discuss LIM 4.0 support.

/jac