Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!sri-spam!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!BU-IT.BU.EDU!tower From: tower@BU-IT.BU.EDU.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.society.futures Subject: Re: Bioproduced nanocomputers Message-ID: <8711052113.AA01020@bu-it.bu.edu> Date: Thu, 5-Nov-87 16:13:40 EST Article-I.D.: bu-it.8711052113.AA01020 Posted: Thu Nov 5 16:13:40 1987 Date-Received: Sun, 8-Nov-87 09:50:48 EST Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: tower@bu-cs.bu.edu Followup-To: <15300@bu-cs.BU.EDU> Organization: Distributed Systems Group, Boston University, 111 Cummington Street, Boston, MA 02215, USA +1 (617) 353-2780 Lines: 29 In article <15300@bu-cs.BU.EDU> you write: > From: unc!leech@mcnc.org (Jonathan Leech) > > People who have read _Engines_of_Creation_ will remember that > Drexler made numerous predictions of fantastic things we could do with > nanotechnology (NT): life extension, interactive design systems > oreders of magnitude more productive than today, nanocomputers, etc, > etc. The problem I have with this idea is that while NT is probably > feasible, it is simply an enabling technology, not a magic panacea. > For example, life extension requires that we understand deeply how > aging affects the body. NT will help researchers, but it won't > suddenly make them so much smarter that they understand in detail how > life 'works'. ... I feel that Drexler's envisioned explosion of > NT remaking the world suddenly is simply not going to happen. An > analogy is the old 'nuclear power too cheap to meter' idea. Comments? > > Jon Leech (leech@cs.unc.edu) Drexler is predicting that both the nanotechnology and AI researchers will succeed, and that it will be Artifically Intelligent Nano-Machine, not Human, Researchers who will make many of the breakthroughs. He makes interesting arguments that these Nano-AI's will think about a million times faster than humans, and be at least as intelligent. BTW, EoC is out in paperback now. It's a book I recommend highly to both the curious and the concerned citizen types. -len