Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!orchid!egisin
From: egisin@orchid.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.emacs,comp.sources.d
Subject: Re: Desperatelly looking for microemacs 3.9
Message-ID: <11590@orchid.waterloo.edu>
Date: Thu, 5-Nov-87 16:56:55 EST
Article-I.D.: orchid.11590
Posted: Thu Nov  5 16:56:55 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 7-Nov-87 15:58:10 EST
References: <72@cui.UUCP> <5745@j.cc.purdue.edu>
Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 21
Keywords: microemacs 3.9
Xref: utgpu comp.emacs:1998 comp.sources.d:1401

In article <5745@j.cc.purdue.edu>, nwd@j.cc.purdue.edu (Daniel Lawrence) writes:
> 	A common enough request, but I need to explain why and ask a
> question. On June 20th I sent a full MicroEMACS 3.9 distribution kit to
> the moderator of comp.unix.sources. He sat on it for three full months.
> When someone asked him why, he responded indicating that editors were
> simply not a high priority.
> 
> 	I know that I have put a lot of work into this. Some people have
> complained at the frequency which I have posted this in the past. But
> the truth is that I have actually made a large amount of changes between
> postings.
> 
> 	So, my question is this. I have version 3.9e running and almost
> ready for distribution. Do you want me to post this? Where? (remember,
> mod.sources.unix won't post it).
> 
[I'm including this in comp.sources.d too].

Can't you post patches two or three times a year?
Every one should be able to get 3.8b from the archives, and apply patches to it.
3.8i was 500K, how big are diffs between successive releases?