Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!hao!ames!amdahl!acs
From: acs@amdahl.amdahl.com (Tony Sumrall)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: CBM and upgrade paths ( My two cents ).
Message-ID: <18051@amdahl.amdahl.com>
Date: Tue, 10-Nov-87 15:34:14 EST
Article-I.D.: amdahl.18051
Posted: Tue Nov 10 15:34:14 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 12-Nov-87 23:33:24 EST
References: <8711040542.AA29099@violet.berkeley.edu> <2696@cbmvax.UUCP> <5807@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> <4410@well.UUCP> <2710@cbmvax.UUCP>
Reply-To: acs@amdahl.amdahl.com (Tony Sumrall)
Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA
Lines: 21

In article <2710@cbmvax.UUCP> hedley@cbmvax.UUCP (Hedley Davis) writes:
>We are scared S***LESS. The whole idea is to build machines which will
>sell to  allow us some breathing room so that we can design the next
>batch. Undoubtly, no one will be satisfied with them either. We ( I )
>think there are alot of nice features, but then again, MWM won't.

I want CBM to remain a viable business.

As *I* perceive it, MWM's only bitch is that his investment in SOTS is
lost...that and he wants assurance that his machine will continue to be
supported-I feel the same way. I'm not upset with the 2000's new features.
I'm not terribly happy that my machine doesn't have 'em but, hey, I bought
early.  I just want continued support for my HW and KS/WB upgrades for my
1000.

Nuff said.
-- 
Tony Sumrall acs@amdahl.com <=> amdahl!acs

[ Opinions expressed herein are the author's and should not be construed
  to reflect the views of Amdahl Corp. ]