Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!mit-eddie!ll-xn!ames!elroy!mahendo!jplgodo!wlbr!scgvaxd!trwrb!cadovax!keithd
From: keithd@cadovax.UUCP (Keith Doyle)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Double Buffering
Message-ID: <1862@cadovax.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 11-Nov-87 13:12:51 EST
Article-I.D.: cadovax.1862
Posted: Wed Nov 11 13:12:51 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 14-Nov-87 05:31:03 EST
References: <7768@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP> <4414@well.UUCP>
Reply-To: keithd@cadovax.UUCP (Keith Doyle)
Organization: Contel Business Systems, Torrance, CA
Lines: 12
Keywords: double buffering, vertical retrace, screens

In article <4414@well.UUCP> ewhac@well.UUCP (Leo 'Bols Ewhac' Schwab) writes:
>	Yup.  After finishing rendering into the off-screen bitmap, you'd
>LoadView() it (or ScrrenToFront() it), then call WaitTOF().  When WaitTOF()
>comes back, the system will be displaying your other view.

Um, wouldn't this be a case where WaitBOVP() would be a teensy bit better?
You get to render through the vertical interval, instead of starting at
the top of the next screen after the vertical interval.  Or has everyone 
just given up on WaitBOVP()?

Keith Doyle
#  {ucbvax,decvax}!trwrb!cadovax!keithd  Contel Business Systems 213-323-8170