Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!cbmvax!carolyn
From: carolyn@cbmvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Double Buffering
Message-ID: <2740@cbmvax.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 12-Nov-87 09:48:26 EST
Article-I.D.: cbmvax.2740
Posted: Thu Nov 12 09:48:26 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 14-Nov-87 14:57:46 EST
References: <7768@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP> <4414@well.UUCP> <1862@cadovax.UUCP>
Reply-To: carolyn@cbmvax.UUCP (Carolyn Scheppner CATS)
Organization: Commodore Technology, West Chester, PA
Lines: 15
Keywords: double buffering, vertical retrace, screens

>
>Um, wouldn't this be a case where WaitBOVP() would be a teensy bit better?
>You get to render through the vertical interval, instead of starting at
>the top of the next screen after the vertical interval.  Or has everyone 
>just given up on WaitBOVP()?

   WaitBOVP(vp) busywaits, WaitTOF() does not.  This has to be taken in
consideration.  For non-multitasking type applications, WaitBOVP(vp) should
be ok.
-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Carolyn Scheppner -- CATS   >>Commodore Amiga Technical Support<<
                     UUCP  ...{allegra,ihnp4,rutgers}!cbmvax!carolyn 
                     PHONE 215-431-9180
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=