Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!oliveb!amiga!cbmvax!hedley
From: hedley@cbmvax.UUCP (Hedley Davis)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: CBM and upgrade paths ( My two cents ).
Message-ID: <2757@cbmvax.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 13-Nov-87 13:28:55 EST
Article-I.D.: cbmvax.2757
Posted: Fri Nov 13 13:28:55 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 15-Nov-87 10:34:49 EST
References: <8711040542.AA29099@violet.berkeley.edu>
Reply-To: hedley@cbmvax.UUCP (Hedley Davis)
Organization: Commodore Technology, West Chester, PA
Lines: 32


About this whole mess:


1)	I should not have told mike to shove it on the net.
	But I did, and, as Leo would say, It felt right. :-)
	( Its also nice to have seen him sink equally low ).

2)	We don't care if y'all complain about problems. Really.
	This is a good thing, and can help everyone if done right.

3)	We DO care if you just get on, and say the same thing over
	and over again. It doesn't matter whether its true or false
	or positive or negative. Its just annoying. Kind of like
	talking to a senile person who just keeps repeating 
	"Gee, looks like rain today".

4)	We also don't really like having lots of yap going on about
	things that absolutely cannot be changed. The yap won't help.
	If you have to do it once or twice to get it off you chest,
	fine, but really there must have been at least 50 postings
	all along the same lines. The latter 40 won't change the
	future, and they sure as hell can't change the past.

5)	An interesting point as too the expansion specs. If we had to
	do it all over again, we'd do it pretty much the same way. 
	Its the right way to go in our opinion. Noone has changed this.

6)	Finally, I've gotten lots of positive EMAIL about this subject.
	As the Los Gatos crowd would say, "Thanks for your support".

Hedley