Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!citcom!jack
From: jack@citcom.UUCP (Jack Waugh)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Real-time vs. Virtual Memory
Message-ID: <113@citcom.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 14-Nov-87 17:19:02 EST
Article-I.D.: citcom.113
Posted: Sat Nov 14 17:19:02 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 15-Nov-87 19:26:55 EST
References: <74@mithras> <1053@sugar.UUCP>
Organization: Citcom Systems, Inc., Herndon, VA
Lines: 8
Summary: Both.

> Virtual memory and real-time don't get along.

Why not side-by-side?  Keep your real-time system, and
allocate some memory to a virtual memory system that
would run at lower priority.  It shouldn't be too hard
to put a gateway between the two so a program in the
protected environment could send text, graphics procedure
calls, etc. to a server in the real-time world.