Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!hao!oddjob!gargoyle!ihnp4!alberta!auvax!rwa
From: rwa@auvax.UUCP (Ross Alexander)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Commodore V. Atari
Message-ID: <397@auvax.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 14-Nov-87 06:59:47 EST
Article-I.D.: auvax.397
Posted: Sat Nov 14 06:59:47 1987
Date-Received: Mon, 16-Nov-87 03:44:59 EST
References: <111400003@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu>
Organization: Athabasca U., Alberta, Canada
Lines: 18
Summary: NO! I REPEAT, NO! NO! NO!

In article <111400003@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu>, mlb338@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu writes:
>      This may seem like a silly request, but I haven't seen it REALLY
> discussed much. . . Exactly how do Commodore and Atari compare currently
> (i.e. sales, technology, image, etc.)

flame {
NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO!
NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO!

WHAT YOU WANT TO DO IS START ANOTHER ***** STUPID ***** FLAME WAR!
} emalf;

this has been absolutely thrashed to death.  go talk to some salesmen
if you really want to hear a lot of utter drivel.  the specs are
public knowledge; all else is mere opinion.

		Yours for higher S / ( S + N ) on the net,
		Ross Alexander @ Athabasca University