Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!rutgers!rochester!PT.CS.CMU.EDU!cadre!pitt!cisunx!ejkst
From: ejkst@cisunx.UUCP (Eric J. Kennedy)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: M2Amiga <-- smack !
Message-ID: <5422@cisunx.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 17-Nov-87 01:49:08 EST
Article-I.D.: cisunx.5422
Posted: Tue Nov 17 01:49:08 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 19-Nov-87 19:45:08 EST
References: <4439@well.UUCP>
Organization: Univ. of Pittsburgh, Comp & Info Sys
Lines: 27

In article <4439@well.UUCP>, ans@well.UUCP (Anne Schweizer) writes:
> [ this is for all non M2Amiga owner.... to prevent them from starvation ]
> 
> First I took a look at the M2Amiga Demo Disk; I was impressed.
> Then i bought M2Amiga; i'm excited !!!
[...] 
> The manual is :-), but it's recomended to buy the official CA kernel
> manuals for additional informations about kernel routines.
[...] 
> I couldn't detect any bugs. I think M2Amiga is the fastest programming
> enviroment on the Amiga and recommend it to all Modula II users and
> also to all C users ( hey men, give up this nasty C ).

I am an x-TDI user, mainly because I simply don't have time to program
anymore.  (not that I ever did.)  What I found before was that it was
difficult to use Modula-2 on the Amiga because _everything_ is written
for C programming, most notably the RKM.  Is this problem any different
for M2Amiga than for TDI?  I'm asking because I liked Pascal, really
liked M2 when I bought TDI, and I tend to fight losing battles with C.
So once I have a little time, (Hey, I'll have more free time when I
graduate and get a job, right? B-) ) I would like to resume with
Modula2.


> 	Anne

Eric Kennedy