Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!nbires!isis!udenva!cu-den!boulder!sunybcs!rutgers!husc6!cca!mirror!adelie!munsell!klm
From: klm@munsell.UUCP (Kevin (Being Weird Isn't Enough) McBride)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: MINIX port to A1000
Message-ID: <1346@atkins.munsell.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 5-Nov-87 09:05:15 EST
Article-I.D.: atkins.1346
Posted: Thu Nov  5 09:05:15 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 8-Nov-87 12:59:32 EST
References: <8711050534.AA25885@jade.berkeley.edu> <21608@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>
Reply-To: klm@atkins.UUCP (Kevin (Being Weird Isn't Enough) McBride)
Organization: Eikonix Corp., Bedford, MA
Lines: 22

In article <21608@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> bryce@hoser.berkeley.edu.UUCP (Bryce Nesbitt) writes:
>
>[discussion on having MINIX co-exist with Amiga EXEC...]
>
>Any comments from the world on two operating systems running as
>equal partners on one machine?  (Shades of Janus or better yet
>Symetrix)

Works for Apollo!  They currently have three OS co-existing on the machine
under one common kernel.  A fourth one is on the way.  I haven't been around
Apollo equipment lately, but I understand that you can be doing stuff in Aegis
(Apollo's proprietary OS) in one window, 4.X BSD in another, and AT&T SYS V in
yet another.  Add Ultrix to that list RSN, although I don't know why anyone 
would want to.  Well, maybe some DEC people who have, too late, discovered the
errors of their ways and don't want to lose a considerable investment in
software when they dump their inferior hardware. :-) :-)

-- 
Kevin McBride, the guy in the brace //       | Your mind is totally controlled
Condition improved, but still      //        | It has been stuffed into my mold
no skiing in sight. (:^[)      \\ //  Amiga  | And you will do as you are told
{encore,adelie}!munsell!klm     \X/   Rules! | until the rights to you are sold