Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!nrl-cmf!ames!sdcsvax!nosc!humu!uhccux!cs313s02 From: cs313s02@uhccux.UUCP (Cs313s02) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: CBM and upgrade paths Message-ID: <1088@uhccux.UUCP> Date: Sat, 7-Nov-87 19:36:24 EST Article-I.D.: uhccux.1088 Posted: Sat Nov 7 19:36:24 1987 Date-Received: Tue, 10-Nov-87 04:44:34 EST References: <1080@uhccux.UUCP> <5814@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> Reply-To: cs313s02@uhccux.UUCP (Cs313s02) Organization: U. of Barbarians. Honolulu, Hawaii Lines: 37 In article <5814@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> (Mike (My watch has windows) Meyer) writes: >In article <1080@uhccux.UUCP> I wrote: >< *Sigh*. I don't see programs that will run on a 16K Apple II anymore. > >But all those machines got replaced by better machine. Of course, you >could also upgrade the Apple II without buying a new computer, and you >could put more than 64K in an IBM-PC without buying a new computer. What prompted me to write the follow-up was your comment that you expect programs to still be able to run under Amiga DOS 1.0 with 256K of memory. Just like my examples, I don't think anybody is still twiddling with an Amiga in that configuration, is there? And you can't really say that the PC was replaced by a better machine, as the XT only sported more memory, and allowed booting from HD. The Apple IIe threw in a vastly superior keyboard [relative to the II], and little more memory. The A2000 adds more than either to their respective predecessors. Of course, the A2000 is still not perfect, but it is a step in the right direction. >The OS/2 example is right, though. CBM and IBM have more in common >than the last two letters of TLA, I guess. *Sigh*, I would have saved a bundle if IBM had something similar to CBM's upgrade policy (prehaps big enough a bundle that would have gotten me an Amiga... 8=). I hope the two companies don't have too much in common (wonna buy my Amiga-Jr, Amiga-370, Amiga-RT, and Amiga-Portable?). >