Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!sri-spam!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!XEROX.COM!"Mike_Beezley.Houston"
From: "Mike_Beezley.Houston"@XEROX.COM.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.8bit
Subject: Analog
Message-ID: <871119-063326-9325@Xerox>
Date: Thu, 19-Nov-87 09:33:01 EST
Article-I.D.: Xerox.871119-063326-9325
Posted: Thu Nov 19 09:33:01 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 21-Nov-87 15:42:38 EST
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 23


  o   ANALOG is slipping! But they will never catch the lack
  o   of quality that Antic now has. Antic is 1 bad publication!

Analog sure will give Antic a run for the money in bad customer
satisfaction.  After buying Analog and Antic on the newsstands for a
year I decided Analog was the better of the 2 magazines.  I subscribed
last December.  I have spent the last year writting letters to Analog
and making phone calls to Robin Levitsky trying to get my subscription
straightened out.  I have yet to get a single issue through normal
subscription channels.  I ususally wait 2 or 3 months and realize that
the mag just isn't going to show up and then give Robin a call and a
couple of weeks later my back issues show up.  All my letters get no
answers.  I have even sent a letter to the editors and I still have no
answer.  My magazines show up months late and there is no response from
the editor even attempting to explain why.

Analog's customer satisfaction rating is about as low as you can go.
You can bet that when they mail my renewal card to me I will ignore it
also.

__mike
"mbeez.houston".xerox.com