Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!ukma!nrl-cmf!ames!hao!oddjob!gargoyle!ihnp4!cbosgd!osu-cis!osupyr!artsvax!mike
From: mike@artsvax.UUCP (Michael Czeiszperger)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.cbm,comp.sys.atari.st,rec.music.synth
Subject: Re: Atari ST or Amiga ?  Help !
Message-ID: <203@artsvax.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 23-Nov-87 22:09:52 EST
Article-I.D.: artsvax.203
Posted: Mon Nov 23 22:09:52 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 28-Nov-87 01:00:59 EST
References: <1226@edison.GE.COM> <3730@trwrb.UUCP>
Organization: OSU College of the Arts Computer Lab
Lines: 22
Keywords: Which one ?
Xref: mnetor comp.sys.cbm:957 comp.sys.atari.st:6456 rec.music.synth:1990

In article <3730@trwrb.UUCP> gibson@trwrb.dsd.trw.com.UUCP (Gregory S. Gibson)
>The Amiga multi-tasking seems to interfer
>with the sequencing time stamp accuracy.
>
Actually, I tracked down this rumour to an article written in Keyboard
magazine last year by the president of Digidesign.  (I once posted the
issue and page number, but it didn't seem to make it out to netland)
In the article, he said that the Amiga had serious problems with time
stamping that preventing it from becoming a professional MIDI machine.
The same sentiment was repeated in another Keyboard column 
months after that, and then spread throughout the country by word
of mouth.  I don't know if it is true or not, but that is who started
it all.  


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Michael S. Czeiszperger      | Disclaimer: "Sorry, I'm all out of pith" 
  Systems Programmer I	      | Smail: Room 406 Baker      (614)
   College of the Arts        |        1971 Neil Avenue      292-
     Computer Lab             |        Columbus, OH 43210     0895
The Ohio State University     | UUCP: {decvax,ucbvax}!cbosgd!osupyr!artsvax!mike
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~