Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!nuchat!sugar!peter
From: peter@sugar.UUCP (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.unix.xenix,comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: comp.unix.unix-at Intro and Charter (long)
Message-ID: <963@sugar.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 2-Nov-87 07:26:00 EST
Article-I.D.: sugar.963
Posted: Mon Nov  2 07:26:00 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 6-Nov-87 00:27:23 EST
References: <152@uwspan.UUCP> <7721@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP>
Organization: Sugar Land UNIX - Houston, TX
Lines: 8
Keywords: microport newsgroup created soon unix-at
Xref: mnetor news.groups:1865 comp.unix.xenix:1101 comp.sys.ibm.pc:9692

The problem is that it's not people with Bell Tech or ISC or intel systems
that form the majority of sys5/286 and sys5/386 volume. It's the people
with Microport systems. Microport has had a lot of problems with bugs and
apparent design flaws. The newsgroup is supposed to address these particular
problems... so why shouldn't the name match the group (for once :->).
-- 
-- Peter da Silva  `-_-'  ...!hoptoad!academ!uhnix1!sugar!peter
-- Disclaimer: These U aren't mere opinions... these are *values*.